September 16 -18 the Triple-S Uganda workstream hosted their counterparts from the Ghana workstream in a learning trip that saw the guests visit Lira district, in Lango region. One of the key issues discussed was the allocation of funds to water and sanitation programmes at district level. Many key questions were raised about the formulae used in both countries.
Published on: 28/09/2012
What started off as a commonplace lecture-like meeting in the Lira District Council Hall, ended up in a spirited discussion about a variety of issues around the delivery of water services in a decentralisation framework. Conditional grants for water and sanitation; mobile phones for water; as well as Hand Pump Mechanics Associations (HPMAs) were the key issues under consideration.
This was on the first day of a three-day learning visit to Lira District, which attracted participants from the Triple-S Ghana Workstream and the Community Water and Sanitation Agency (CWSA). The hosting delegation comprised the entire Uganda Workstream team, Lira District political leaders, technical staff, extension workers and hand pump mechanics.
The presentation about the delivery and coordination of water services under the decentralisation framework spurred the most vigorous discussion, with the Ghana colleagues expressing interest in learning how the District Water and Sanitation Conditional Grant (DWSCG) works and whether it is a viable formula.
The DWSCG is a quarterly disbursement of funds by the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (MoFPED). After allocation and approval by MoFPED, a cash release is sent to the districts through Bank of Uganda. But this only happens after the District Water Officers have submitted quarterly reports and workplans to the Ministry of Water and Environment by the 30th of the month ending the accounts with allocated amounts.
In this respect, the Ghanaian team raised a whole host of questions:
By way of response, the Ugandan team explained that the formula may not be perfect, but it provides a guideline on how to spend the conditional grant. Failure to comply with the conditions comes with serious legal repercussions and can easily lead to the imprisonment of the culprit.
The team further clarified that whereas the 70% of the budget is allocated to construction of new sources, the detail that goes in there covers all the necessary steps including pre-construction; community mobilisation and sensitisation; training of communities on source management. Moreover, it requires more funds to set up a water facility than to service it. For example, the estimated cost for sinking a borehole is 20 million Uganda Shillings (US$ 8000). In July 2012, the Kabarole district hand pump mechanics association submitted bills of quantities for the rehabilitation and major repairs of 30 sources including boreholes, shallow wells and the highest bill was 2.33 million Uganda Shillings (US$ 932).
As for the monthly collections, the money is used for minor repairs and may also be used as revolving fund/loan scheme so that it serves other development purposes rather than lie idle at the treasurer’s house. Borrowing is restricted to registered water users and the loans are paid back with an interest. The WUC is always mindful of leaving enough cash to use should the need for a minor repair arise.
To make it a two-way learning experience, the Ghanaian team also shared their own approach so that both countries could learn from each other. From what they shared, Ugandans learnt that:
In Ghana the process involves all stakeholders including: political leaders, development partners, and technical staff and target communities. The planning, coordinated by the Community Water and Sanitation Agency goes through all levels including: the headquarters of CWSA, the regions, districts, and communities.
Just like in Uganda where the District Council approves budgets, the District Assembly in Ghana plays a crucial role in planning for water and sanitation. However, it was observed that whereas the Ugandan approach allows for a comprehensive and detailed WASH planning, the Ghana approach only affords one paragraph of WASH in the Medium Term Development Plan. “Water and Sanitation issues are not described in detail in the District Medium Term Development plan and we need to start working towards that,” Tom Laari from Ghana suggested.
Long after this learning visit has ended, discussions will continue on what is the most workable approach to allocation of district funds for water and sanitation programmes. But both the Ghana and Uganda team will agree that whatever the allocations, due attention should be paid to provision of new water facilities as well as maintenance of existing ones in order to provide WASH services that last.
| Current allocation of District Water and Sanitation Conditional Grant by the Ministry of Water and Environment in Uganda | |
| Investment in new sources | 70% |
| Software | 12% |
| Operation and maintenance | 8% |
| Sanitation | 6% |
| Office operations | 4% |
By Lydia Mirembe and Deirdre Casella
