Monitoring, capacity development and learning are often addressed as separate processes. But could linking them offer improvements?
Published on: 11/06/2013
Continuous joint monitoring needs strengthening so that it contributes to building the capacities of sector stakeholders to make water and sanitation services reach everyone and keep working.
The session we organised at UNESCO-IHE’s symposium last month provided an opportunity to reflect on the potential links between monitoring, learning and capacity development. We looked into the experience of developing a country-wide system for monitoring rural water supplies in Uganda and in Honduras.
Over the course of ten years, Uganda has developed a monitoring system that feeds into planning, coordination and capacity development. In Honduras the monitoring system is still a work in progress. However, there is already evidence of learning, capacity development and better post-construction support, all crucial for keeping the water flowing.
Both cases demonstrate the potential of monitoring for sector improvement. Better service delivery requires that people systematically learn about what works and what doesn't, so that they can improve. Capacity support so that they can do their jobs better is also crucial. At IRC’s Monitoring Symposium in April this year a range of related lessons about monitoring emerged:
Monitoring is:
Monitoring requires:
There is no one- size-fits-all monitoring solution; flexibility and realism are needed.
The process of collection, joint systematic reflection and analysis requires capacities. If well-facilitated it can empower people to be more competent at analysing and presenting the data, and more articulate in communicating this information and advocating for action. Community groups can also use monitoring to hold service providers and politicians accountable about their investment priorities. In both Uganda and Honduras, users’ feedback is included in the monitoring system.
The cases of Honduras and Uganda show that WASH service delivery monitoring has potential for strengthening capacity in the sector for:
Capacity needs can be identified for each step in the monitoring process, from deciding what to measure and how, to data collection and to using the data for action.
The purposes of monitoring WASH service delivery are as diverse as the number of stakeholders involved. Different countries have different monitoring journeys, but there is potential to learn from each other.
Key lessons about developing a country-wide monitoring system are:
Well-documented experiences from Uganda and Honduras are certainly a useful resource for others who are in the process of developing country monitoring systems. In Latin America, IRC has supported and written about the process of developing indicators for monitoring the sustainability of rural WASH services and defining the institutional arrangements for monitoring in El Salvador, Honduras and Paraguay. In Ghana, IRC has been working with the Community Water and Sanitation Agency (CWSA) to monitor sustainable water service provision. IRC’s symposium generated many other case studies and helped clarify lessons, challenges and remaining questions around monitoring sustainability of water and sanitation services.
And besides documents, it is clear that conversations can help us learn from each other. Our session was too short to really get into the nitty gritty. A discussion group on national sector water monitoring provides further opportunity for further on-line dialogue and exchange of lessons.
At IRC we have strong opinions and we value honest and frank discussion, so you won't be surprised to hear that not all the opinions on this site represent our official policy.