Skip to main content

Decentralized Provincial Community Participation and Education (PEC) was found to be the most cost-effective modality, with significant potential for local ownership and sustainability.

TitleCost-effectiveness analysis of the various CLTS implementation modalities used in Mozambique
Publication TypeResearch Report
Year of Publication2024
AuthorsUandela, S, Toubkis, J, Aubriot, J
Corporate AuthorsIRC
Secondary TitleWASH technical paper
NumberTP/04/2024
Pagination12 p. : 4 fig., 1 map, 2 tab.
Date Published06/2024
PublisherUNICEF
Place PublishedNew York, NY, USA
Publication LanguageEnglish
Abstract

This technical paper evaluates the cost-effectiveness of various Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) implementation modalities in Mozambique, supported by UNICEF since 2009. The study compares Provincial Community Participation and Education (PEC), Decentralized and District PEC, District-driven Team (DDT), and District Sanitation Fund (DSF) modalities. It finds that PEC modalities are more effective and cost-efficient than DDT and DSF, with higher conversion rates to Open Defecation Free (ODF) status and lower unit costs per ODF community. Decentralized PEC is identified as the most cost-effective, with significant potential for local ownership and sustainability. The paper highlights the need for improved planning, budgeting, and payment mechanisms tailored to results, enhanced capacity building for government actors, and a clear segregation of functions among stakeholders to ensure accountability and sustainability. The recommendations aim to guide future CLTS implementations towards greater cost-effectiveness and sustainability in Mozambique. [author abstract]

URLhttps://knowledge.unicef.org/wash/resource/technical-paper-cost-effectiveness-analysis-various-clts-implementation-modalities-used
Citation Key91235

Locations

Themes

Disclaimer

The copyright of the documents on this site remains with the original publishers. The documents may therefore not be redistributed commercially without the permission of the original publishers.

Back to
the top