Skip to main content

The majority of 'last mile" households still practising open defecation were those that were defiant', socially isolated or geographically isolated.

TitleIdentifying the last 10% of households practising open defecation in rural Tanzania
Publication TypeBriefing Note
Year of Publication2019
AuthorsSNV
Pagination14 p. : 10 fig.
Date Published06/2019
PublisherSNV Tanzania
Place PublishedDar es Salaam, Tanzania
Publication LanguageEnglish
Abstract

Since 2017, SNV and the Government of Tanzania have been implementing the Sustainable Sanitation and Hygiene for All (SSH4A) programme in eight Tanzanian districts. To date, the number of households that use toilets has increased to 90%. In the period March–April 2019, SNV Tanzania undertook a household survey in the eight project districts to identify the 10% of households still practising open defecation or sharing toilets despite the concerted government and SNV sanitation interventions. The findings show the majority of the households still practising open defecation and sharing latrines in the rural districts of Tanzania are not those commonly cited by the literature and sanitation programming – the people in poverty, the elderly people, people with disabilities, and those with other specific vulnerabilities. The majority in 'the last mile' are: 1) the 'defiant' households that have the socio-economic resources to build themselves latrines but prefer to practise open defecation or share toilets; 2) the socially isolated households that do not have a financially able family member who can support them; and 3) the geographically isolated households that are far from information centres. The SNV study also revealed a relatively high percentage of households headed by single mothers and those living in difficult terrains as part of the last mile. Furthermore, the study identified opportunities to increase access to sanitation among the last mile groups. These are: 1) introduction of behaviour change re-enforcement interventions tailored to different target groups; 2) promotion of context-specific sanitation technologies; and 3) introduction of community-led 'social exclusion' strategies. [author abstract]

Notes

Includes 9 ref.

Citation Key85908

Locations

Themes

Disclaimer

The copyright of the documents on this site remains with the original publishers. The documents may therefore not be redistributed commercially without the permission of the original publishers.

Back to
the top